Nickolas John Andrade v. United States Parole Commission

Good Law
52 F.3d 332·1995 WL 163587·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18737
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 199594-16197California849 words

Opinion

Opinion

52 F.3d 332 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nickolas John ANDRADE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-16197. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1995. * Decided April 7, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nickolas John Andrade, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his mandamus petition to require the United States Parole Commission to execute a parole violator warrant and hold a parole revocation hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 In December 1987, Andrade was serving a special parole term on a federal conviction for manufacturing methamphetamine. He was arrested and held on a new federal charge, and the Parole Commission issued a detainer based on the new charge. In December 1988, Andrade pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine and was sentenced…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.