Robert Curot v. Donna E. Shalala

52 F.3d 332 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert CUROT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56435. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1995. * Decided April 6, 1995. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and KING, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Claimant Robert Curot appeals from the decision of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the "Secretary") on Curot's petition for judicial review of the Secretary's final decision denying his application for disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Curot contends that the Secretary erred in (1) rejecting the opinion of Curot's treating physicians; and (2) determining that Curot had the residual functional capacity ("RFC") to perform medium work. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. I. 4 Curot filed an application for…