Ramin Mazloumi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

52 F.3d 333 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ramin MAZLOUMI, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70033. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1995. * Decided April 7, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ramin Mazloumi, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision affirming the immigration judge's ("IJ") denial of Mazloumi's application for suspension of deportation under section 244(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1254 (a)(1). Mazloumi contends that the BIA erred by finding that he failed to demonstrate "extreme hardship." We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105 (a), and we deny the petition. 3 * BIA's Summary Affirmance 4 Mazloumi contends that the BIA abused its discretion by summarily affirming the IJ's decision. This contention lacks merit. 5…