Kathy D. Ishman v. Anthony Frank, and Any of His Successors in Office, in His Capacity as the Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service

52 F.3d 333 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kathy D. ISHMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anthony FRANK, and any of his successors in office, in his capacity as the Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-15886. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1995. * Decided April 7, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Nevada, D.C. No. CV-85-00015-LDG; Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kathy D. Ishman appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of her former employer, the United States Postal Service ("USPS"), in her employment discrimination action brought under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e-16. Ishman alleged that the USPS wrongfully imposed a probationary period upon her reinstatement as a postal employee in May 1983, following her charges that she was discharged in…