Licon v. Infergene Co.

52 F.3d 333 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel R. LICON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. The INFERGENE COMPANY; Linda E. Stanley; Pierce Chemical Company; Eugene N. Stuart, III; Timothy L. Legerton; Elizabeth Jo Wegstein; Brent Esmon; Aubrey Bruce Amsden; W. Dirk Sikkema; Kerstin Stanley; Robb K. Anderson; Robert A. Vigna; Ari Ma'Hah; Conaly Bedell; Paul Wright; Frank E. Hagie, Jr., Defendants/Appellees. No. 93-16948. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 16, 1995. * Decided April 7, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 * A dismissal under Rule 41(b) will not be disturbed unless there is "a definite and firm conviction that the court below committed clear error of judgment in the conclusion it reached...." Eldridge v. Block, 832 F.2d 1132, 1136 (9th Cir.1987) (internal quotation omitted). "The question, of course, is not whether [the Supreme] Court, or whether the Court of Appeals, would as an…