Schouweiler v. Findley

Good Law
52 F.3d 334·1995 WL 152144·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18797
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 6, 199593-56549California1,491 words

Opinion

Opinion

52 F.3d 334 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stephanie Ann SCHOUWEILER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Don E. FINDLEY, personally and in his official capacity as Director, UCLA Conference Center, Lake Arrowhead; Nancy Noble; UCLA Alumni Association; University of California at Los Angeles; UCLA Conference Center, Lake Arrowhead; Bruin Woods, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56549. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1995. * Decided April 6, 1995. Before: NOONAN, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Stephanie Ann Schouweiler brought numerous discrimination-related claims under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1981 , 1983 and 1985(3) against Don Findley and Nancy Noble, her supervisors at work. The district court granted summary judgment for Findley and Noble. We affirm. 3 * Schouweiler, a white woman, worked as a supervisor in the housekeeping department at the University of California at Los Angeles Conference Center at Lake Arrowhead,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.