In re M.C. Products, Inc.

Good Law
52 F.3d 334·1995 WL 227393·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18779
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 199593-56445California969 words

Opinion

Opinion

52 F.3d 334 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re M.C. PRODUCTS, INC., fdba Men's Care Products, Inc., and Telephone Fantasies, Inc., Debtor. M.C. PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, dba AT & T; MRO Communications, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56445. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 5, 1995. Decided April 17, 1995. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges, and TANNER * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 The bankruptcy court denied a motion brought by M.C. Products, Inc., a Chapter 11 debtor, for a preliminary injunction. M.C. Products appeals from the district court's affirmance of that denial and from the district court's denial of a motion for rehearing. AT & T maintains that we lack jurisdiction to consider the appeal from the district court's affirmance of the bankruptcy court because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 4 I. The Appeal from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.