Margarita Capulong Pahati v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

52 F.3d 334 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Margarita Capulong PAHATI, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70913. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 3, 1995. * Decided April 10, 1995. Before: NOONAN, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Margarita Capulong Pahati (Pahati) petitions for a review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (the Board) denying her appeal from an order of deportation. We deny the petition. ANALYSIS 3 Pahati has two sisters and a grandmother who legally reside in San Francisco. She also has cousins residing in Los Angeles. Her parents and the majority of her siblings live in the Philippines. She is not married and has no children. As Pahati acknowledges "the Board is not required under [Sec. 1254(a)(1) ] to consider the hardship to a third party other than a spouse, parent or child" who are either citizens or legal permanent residents…