Ubaldo Ruezga Padilla v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

52 F.3d 334 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ubaldo Ruezga PADILLA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70911. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 13, 1995. Decided April 21, 1995. Before: TANG, SCHROEDER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Petitioner Ubaldo Ruezga-Padilla, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") dismissal of his appeal from the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") denial of his application for waiver of excludability pursuant to section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105 (a)(1), and we deny the petition. 3 "We review the BIA's balancing of the equities for section 212(c) relief for an abuse of discretion. We may set aside the BIA's denial of section 212(c) relief only if the Board failed to support its conclusion with a…