Shangri-La Canyon Country, Ltd Raznick & Sons, Inc. Ron Naquin Valerie Berry William Roth v. Continental Casualty Company

Good Law
52 F.3d 334·1995 WL 227386·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18791
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 199593-56585California876 words

Opinion

Opinion

52 F.3d 334 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. SHANGRI-LA CANYON COUNTRY, LTD; Raznick & Sons, Inc.; Ron Naquin; Valerie Berry; William Roth, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-56585. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 9, 1995. Decided April 17, 1995. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 In this diversity action, plaintiffs, Shangri-La Canyon Country, Ltd., a land development partnership, Raznick & Sons, Inc., a Californian corporation, and its employees Ron Naquin, Valerie Berry, and William Roth (collectively "Shangri-La") appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of Shangri-La's insurer, Continental Casualty Company ("Continental"). We affirm the district court's decision. 4 1. In its complaint, Shangri-La sought a declaratory judgment that its commercial general liability insurance policy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.