Pride Technologies Incorporated v. Sun Microsystems Computer Corporation

52 F.3d 334 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. PRIDE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUN MICROSYSTEMS COMPUTER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-15474. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 15, 1995. Decided April 12, 1995. Before: SNEED, HUG, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a motion for a preliminary injunction. The underlying action in the district court arises from Sun Microsystems Computer Corporation ("Sun") giving notice to Pride Technologies Incorporated ("Pride") that it intended to terminate the Indirect Value Added Reseller Agreement ("Agreement") that had been executed by the parties. We have stated our standard of review for granting or denying a preliminary injunction, as follows: 3 To obtain a preliminary injunction, a party must demonstrate either 1) a combination of probable success on the merits and the…