Romualdo Joaquin Navarro v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

52 F.3d 334 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Romualdo Joaquin NAVARRO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70205. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1995. * Decided April 10, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Romualdo Navarro petitions for review of the Board of Immigrations' (BIA) order upholding the Immigration Judge's (IJ) order of deportation. Navarro contends the BIA erred by denying his request for voluntary departure to the Philippines. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a) and deny the petition. 3 Navarro entered the United States in 1983 as a visitor authorized to stay six months. Deportation proceedings commenced in 1989 because Navarro had overstayed his visit. 4 At the January 1990 hearing, the IJ continued the proceedings to September to allow Navarro time to prepare a case for asylum. The IJ admonished Navarro that he…