In Re Eric H. Randolph, AKA Eric A. Randolph, Fka Harmut Presterl, Debtor. John Mitchell, Trustee v. Eric H. Randolph v. Edith Randolph

Good Law
52 F.3d 334·1995 WL 163594·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18799
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 199594-35294California275 words

Opinion

Opinion

52 F.3d 334 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Eric H. RANDOLPH, aka Eric A. Randolph, fka Harmut Presterl, Debtor. John MITCHELL, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eric H. RANDOLPH, Appellant. v. Edith RANDOLPH, et al., Defendants. No. 94-35294. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1995. * Decided April 7, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Eric H. Randolph, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal as moot of his appeal from an order of the bankruptcy court finding that a certain bond was property of Randolph's estate in bankruptcy. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d), and affirm. 3 Randolph contends the bankruptcy court's finding regarding the bond was in error. The district court concluded that Randolph's appeal is moot because following the commencement of this litigation, the bond was paid into Randolph's bankruptcy estate. Because no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.