William Albert Reinke v. United States

52 F.3d 334 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William Albert REINKE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-56222. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1995. * Decided April 7, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Albert Reinke, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion to reconsider the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. Reinke contends the district court erred when it denied his section 2255 motion as successive. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 , and we affirm. 3 On April 28, 1994, the district court order denying Reinke's section 2255 motion was entered. On May 18, 1994, Reinke signed a motion for reconsideration which was filed in the district court on June 7, 1994. By order of August 2, 1994, entered on August 4, 1994, the district court denied Reinke's motion for…