United States v. Gary L. Harrison

Good Law
52 F.3d 335·1995 WL 218508·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18819
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 13, 199594-10325California1,063 words

Opinion

Opinion

52 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary L. HARRISON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10325. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1995. * Decided April 13, 1995. Before: SNEED, SCHROEDER, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gary Lee Harrison appeals his conviction and sentence for carjacking and use of a firearm during a crime of violence. He argues that (1) conviction for both crimes violates the Double Jeopardy Clause, and (2) the district court erred in denying him a reduction in sentence based on acceptance of responsibility. We affirm. I. 3 On September 11, 1993, Nancy Correa and her mother, Raquel, parked their car outside Long's Drugstore in Ceres, California. Gary Lee Harrison, armed with a gun, approached the passenger side of the car and demanded the keys. Nancy gave Harrison the keys after her mother told her to do so. Nancy and Raquel then ran into the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.