United States v. Michael Avery Bartlett

Good Law
52 F.3d 335·1995 WL 165600·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18813
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 199594-10331California1,046 words

Opinion

Opinion

52 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Avery BARTLETT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10331. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1995. * Decided April 10, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael Avery Bartlett appeals his 354-month sentence imposed following guilty pleas to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1) and possession of a firearm during a narcotics offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 924 (c)(1). Bartlett contends that his California second-degree burglary convictions do not qualify as predicate violent felonies under the Armed Career Criminal Act because his convictions do not meet the requirements of "generic burglary" as set forth in Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm. 3 "We review de novo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.