United States v. Jonathan Edward Brown

52 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan Edward BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50235. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 6, 1995. * Decided April 5, 1995. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and KING, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Jonathan Edward Brown appeals from his conviction and 75-month sentence after pleading guilty to two counts of unarmed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a). 4 Brown argues on appeal that the court erred in not specifically enforcing the pre-indictment plea agreement. We assume the argument was properly preserved for appeal. The district court found that there was no such agreement. After carefully considering the representations made by the participants, the judge found that there were preindictment negotiations "but no preindictement agreement." We review for clear error, United States v.…