United States v. Todd Eugene Cannady

52 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Todd Eugene CANNADY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50207. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 6, 1995. Decided April 11, 1995. Before: FERGUSON, BEEZER, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Todd Eugene Cannady appeals from his conviction and sentence following a jury trial for armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113 (a) and (d). Cannady contends that the jury selection system that was used to select his jury is unconstitutional because it did not produce a fair cross section of the community. We have addressed this issue in a separate opinion. Cannady appeals on four additional grounds, contending that the district court erred 1) in admitting a Certificate of Proof of Insured Status as evidence that the bank which was robbed was FDIC-insured on the date of the robbery; 2) in allowing the government to strike…