United States v. Imran A. Mir

52 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Imran A. MIR, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10296. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 14, 1995. * Decided April 19, 1995. 1 Before: TANG and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, Senior District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Appellant Imran Mir was convicted of solicitation to commit a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 373 . He appeals the district court's exclusion of a non-testifying witness' presentence reports. He also appeals his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. I. 4 In 1991, Mir was indicted for conspiracy to import and distribute heroin and possession of heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846, 952, 963. In the same year, he was also indicted on five counts of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1956 (a)(2)(A). 5 While Mir was awaiting trial…