United States v. Tay Chu, AKA Chu Tay Thuong

52 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tay CHU, aka Chu Tay Thuong, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50290. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1995. * Decided April 21, 1995. 1 Before: BROWNING and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and JONES, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Tay Chu appeals the district court's imposition of the statutory maximum 24 month term of imprisonment for Chu's violations of the terms and conditions of his supervised release. Chu contends that the district court did not give adequate reasons for its decision to impose a sentence outside the range of 12 to 18 months recommended by the Sentencing Commission's applicable policy statement. United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual Sec. 7B1.4(a). We have jurisdiction over Chu's timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. 4 * We review the factual findings underlying the district court's…