United States v. Sergio Ceballes-Gamez

Good Law
52 F.3d 335·1995 WL 163589·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18811
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 199594-30363California1,223 words

Opinion

Opinion

52 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio CEBALLES-GAMEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30363. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1995. * Decided April 7, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sergio Ceballes-Gamez appeals his guilty plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1), and for illegal reentry by a deported alien subsequent to conviction of an aggravated felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 (b)(2). He contends the district erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during a vehicle search in conjunction with a warrantless arrest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Generally, motions to suppress are reviewed de novo. United States v. Khan, 993 F.2d 1368, 1375 (9th Cir.1993). Factual findings are reviewed for clear…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.