United States v. Frank Eugene May

Good Law
52 F.3d 335
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 199594-10011California3,117 words

Opinion

Opinion

52 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frank Eugene MAY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10011. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 13, 1995. Decided March 29, 1995. As Amended April 10, 1995. Before: ALDISERT, * CHOY, and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In August of 1994, a jury convicted Mr. Frank Eugene May of importation of cocaine, use of a communication facility to import cocaine, and of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 952 and 843(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g)(1). May appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress statements and evidence obtained through a warrantless search of his hotel room. We affirm the district court's ruling. I. 3 On February 1, 1993, United States Customs Service Special Agent Ronald B. Wolflick learned that contraband had been discovered inside a Federal Express package…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.