United States v. David R. Knapp, United States of America v. Grk Corporation, Dba Knapp Ford/mercury

Good Law
52 F.3d 335·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18821
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 5, 199594-10022California4,371 words

Opinion

Opinion

52 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David R. KNAPP, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GRK CORPORATION, dba Knapp Ford/Mercury, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-10022, 94-10023. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 17, 1994. Decided April 5, 1995. 1 Before: ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Defendants/Appellants David R. Knapp and GRK Corporation dba Knapp Ford/Mercury (collectively "Knapp") appeal jointly from a conviction and sentence for (1) conspiracy to money launder, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 371 ; (2) money laundering, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1956 (a)(1)(B)(i); and (3) filing false currency transaction reports, 26 U.S.C. Secs. 6050I(f)(1)(B) and 7206(1) & (2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and affirm. DISCUSSION 4 I. Jury Instructions. 5 The standard of review of a district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.