United States v. Robert Dana Estabrook

52 F.3d 335 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Dana ESTABROOK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10443. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1995. * Decided April 7, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Dana Estabrook appeals his conviction, following a conditional guilty plea, for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 922 (g)(1) and 924(a)(2). Estabrook contends that the district court erred in ruling that the firearm would inevitably have been discovered. Estabrook argues that the district court's finding that the investigative detention was brief was clearly erroneous. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's denial of a motion to suppress. United States v. Becker, 23 F.3d 1537, 1539 (9th Cir.1994). We review the district court's…