United States v. Allan Edward Woodbridge

52 F.3d 336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allan Edward WOODBRIDGE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30213. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 6, 1995. Decided April 13, 1995. IN PART, VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART. Before: SKOPIL, HALL, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Allan Edward Woodbridge appeals his conviction and sentence on twelve counts of knowingly possessing machineguns in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 922 (o) and 924(a)(2). We affirm Woodbridge's conviction, but remand for resentencing. I. 3 Woodbridge contends that the district court committed constitutional error in excluding various items of evidence. After conducting a de novo review of the record, we conclude that the court did not so err. 4 (a) The AR-15's 5 (i) Proffered testimony on "slam-firing" and manual manipulation 6 Woodbridge argues that the district court erred in excluding his evidence…