United States v. Garabet Zakarian

Good Law
52 F.3d 336·1995 WL 163597·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18843
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 7, 199594-50125California227 words

Opinion

Opinion

52 F.3d 336 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garabet ZAKARIAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50125. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1995. * Decided April 7, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Garabet Zakarian appeals his conviction following a guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1), 846. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Zakarian's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review. Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no meritorious issue for review. Accordingly, the motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED. * The panel unanimously finds this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.