Olmstead

Olmstead v. United States

Good Law
29 F.2d 239·1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2658
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 19, 1928No. 5532California4,401 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dietrich, J.

At all times herein mentioned appellant Emery Olm-stead was a director and the president of the Northwestern National Bank of Portland, Or., actively engaged in the transaction of its business, and appellant Wheeler was a large stockholder and customer of the bank. Through corporations and in his own name Wheeler transacted business on an extensive scale and carried several accounts in the bank, referred to in banking circles and the record as “the Wheeler lines.” ‘ To some extent the two were associated in business other than the bank. One of the companies operated by Wheeler was the McCormick Lumber Company, carrying on a lumbering business at McCormick, Wash., and in the main its relations and dealings with the bank constitute the subject-matter of the record.

Both appellants were acquitted on the first count in the indictment, charging them with conspiring to misapply the funds of the bank, and were convicted and by the court adjudged guilty upon each of the other 22 *241 counts charging Olmstead with the misapplication of funds and Wheeler with aiding and abetting him in such misapplication. The method by which the government contends the bank was despoiled consisted of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.