Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of Seattle

Good Law
29 F.2d 254·1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2662
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 5, 1928No. 5457California810 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hunt, J.

(after stating the facts as above). In our opinion, plaintiff has failed to show itself entitled to relief. By section 5 of the ordinance, authorizing the bonds and the acquisition of the street railway system, the city obligated itself to pay into the special fund out of the gross revenue of the railway system, one calendar month prior to the due date of any installment of principal or interest, sufficient sums to meet such installments, and to pay such installments when due. City of Seattle v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. (C. C. A.) 284 F. 659 . Section 4 of Ordinance 39069, authorizing the execution of the pur *257 chase contract, provided that forthwith, upon delivery of the deed and bill of sale to the city by the company, the city could enter into possession of the property and operate the same, and could receive all of the revenue “arising therefrom with no obligation whatever to account to the company for the same or any part thereof, save and except to provide therefrom for the payment of the interest and principal of the utility bonds authorized by Ordinance 39025, as therein provided, subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement.” Inasmuch as it appears that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.