Manson

Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. Manson

Good Law
31 F.2d 806·1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1095
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 1929No. 18228KCalifornia422 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

A motion has been made to transfer this ease to the equity side of this court,, for the trial of certain issues raised by the answer and counterclaim on file, prior to the trial of issues of law by the jury. The theory of the motion is that the answer and counterclaim plead equitable defenses and seek equitable relief in this action at law, under the provisions of section 274b, Judicial Code, 28 USCA § 398.

The complaint is based upon a consignment contract, and seeks either the return of certain consigned goods or their value, together with dam'ages for the alleged wrongful detention of the goods. The answer and counterclaim raise the issue of fraud in the inception of the contract pleaded by plaintiff. The counterclaim seeks money damages, both general and special, and does not ask any of the remedies peculiar to equity.

The Judicial Code provides in section 267 (28 USCA § 384): “Suits in equity shall not be sustained in any court of the United States in any ye ase where a plain, adequate, and complete remedy may be had at law.”

It has been held, under this section, that an action sounding in fraud, where the only relief sought is money damages, is an action not cognizable in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.