New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Ins. v. Clark

Good Law
33 F.2d 235·1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2691
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 1929No. 5754California958 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rudkin, J.

This was an action on an automobile policy of liability insurance. The plaintiff in the action recovered judgment for personal injuries against the insured in a state court of Oregon for the sum of $50,570, together with $127.30 costs of suit. Execution on the judgment was returned unsatisfied, and' the present action was thereupon instituted against the insurance company. The company admitted liability, so that the only question for consideration is the extent of that liability. The court below gave judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $10,000, the limit of liability fixed by the policy, together with interest on the entire amount of the judgment in the state court and all costs incurred in that court. The judgment for interest and costs was based on a provision of the policy wherein the company agreed: “To pay, irrespective of the limits of liability hereinafter mentioned, all costs taxed against the assured in any legal proceedings defended by the company pursuant to the foregoing agreement, and all interest accruing after entry of judgment in such proceedings.” The company has appealed from the judgment and challenges the right of the appellee to recover either…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.