Rasmussen

Murray Hospital v. Rasmussen

Good Law
35 F.2d 864·1930 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9019·8 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 9770·8 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 9770·1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3098
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 1929No. 5860California410 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rudkin, J.

As will appear from the opinion on a former appeal, the principal question in this case is whether the entire sum of $100,000, there mentioned, was paid on account of the purchase price of capital stock of the corporation, or whether $57,-200 of that amount was an ordinary and necessary expense, paid and incurred during the taxable year in carrying on the trade and business of the corporation, or was a loss sustained by the corporation during the taxable year, not compensated for by insurance or otherwise. We there held that the complaint was sufficient in form and substance to show that the $57,200 was either an ordinary and necessary expense or a loss, and reversed the judgment of the trial court. Murray Hospital v. Rasmussen, 20 F.(2d) 29 . After the case was remanded, an answer was filed, and the ease came on for trial before a jury. At the close of all the testimony, the court directed the jury to return a verdiet in favor of the defendant, and from a judgment on the verdiet this appeal was prosecuted.

At the threshold of the ease, the appellant is met with the objection that no exception was reserved to the instruction of the court directing a verdiet in favor of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.