Davies Motors, Inc. v. United States

Good Law
35 F.2d 928·1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3115
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 1929No. 5889California1,386 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wilbur, J.

The intervener and appellant sold the Willys-Knight roadster automobile, respondent herein, to one Hans P. Mortensen by a conditional sales contract under which it retained ownership of the automobile. At the time the automobile was seized by a government prohibition agent, September 27, 1928, the balance due on the purchase .price was $896. The district attorney filed a libel under section 3450, Rev. St. (26 USCA § 1181), alleging that at the time the automobile was seized it contained 12 pint bottles of intoxicating liquor, which had been concealed therein with the intent to defraud the United States government of the taxes due thereon. The sole question, presented by the appeal is whether or not, under the faets stipulated by the parties and found by the trial court, the rights of the intervener are forfeited under section 3450, or whether, being innocent of all complicity in the wrongful acts of Mortensen, it can invoke the provisions of section 26 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 40).

It appears from the stipulation that, at the time the automobile was seized by Paul L. Mathias, prohibition agent, he had stationed himself in. the rear of the Sequoia…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.