Nepstad
Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Nepstad
36 F.2d 947·1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2305
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 17, 1929No. 5706California82 words
Lead Opinion
Wilbur, J.
This is a companion ease to Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Melin (No. 5671) 36 F.(2d) 907 , to which reference is hereby made for a more particular statement of the facts.
The court instructed the jury as to what constituted a commercial orchard substantially as in the ease of Sacramento, etc., v. Nelson (No. 5683) 36 F.(2d) 929 , and in the case of Sacramento, etc., v. Haenggi (No. 5678) 36 F.(2d) 923 , and therein held erroneous.
Judgment reversed.