McCarthy

McCarthy v. Bloedel Donovan Lumber Mills

Good Law
39 F.2d 34·1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4014
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 24, 1930No. 5933California1,451 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dietrich, J.

Appellee is the owner of large tracts of timber in Western Washington which it is engaged in logging. Eor that purpose it constructed and now operates a private logging railroad extending southerly from the seaboard at Clallam Bay to some of its lands. To reach additional holdings it plans to extend this road, and will need a right of way which in part lies across lands belonging to appellants. Not being able to acquire the right by contract, it brought this proceeding in eminent domain. For the background of the issues now submitted, reference may be made to our opinion on. a former appeal, Ruddock et al. v. Bloedel Donovan Lumber Mills, 28 F.(2d) 684 . Pursuant to our mandate, the court below, after hearings had in compliance with the statutes, entered an order adjudicating use and necessity, and, following a verdict fixing the amount of compensation to be paid, a final decree of appropriation. From this decree three of the four defendants prosecute this appeal.

Aside from the constitutional question ruled by our former decision, in substance the contentions urged by appellants are: (1) That the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of "necessity" for any part of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.