United States v. Southern Pac. R.

Good Law
43 F.2d 591·1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1328
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 1930No. 1-116California883 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

This action was brought by the United States to obtain a decree vacating patent issued to the Southern Pacific Railroad Company covering eighty acres of land, being the east one-half of the northeast one-quarter of section 35, township 3 south, range 10 east, 5. B. M., the same being located in this judicial district. The land had been selected by the defendant as indemnity land under its grant allotment. The railroad company listed the land as of nonmineral character, which met the requirement of the act of Congress which excludes mineral land from appropriation under grant allotments. Before patent was issued, the Land Office directed ,-a contest to be instituted before the local land officers, to determine whether the land was in faet nonmineral. The defendant had notice of the hearing before the register and receiver, and produced ,witnesses at the hearing who gave testimony opposed to that presented by witnesses called by the government.

It was determined «by the register and receiver that the land was mineral in character, and recommendation was made to the Land Office that the defendant’s selection be canceled. An appeal was taken by the railroad company, which appeal was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.