National Labor Relations Board v. Mike Yurosek & Son, Inc.

Good Law
53 F.3d 261·95 Daily Journal DAR 5110·149 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2094·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9047·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2936
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 199593-70754California3,013 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boochever, J.

The National Labor Relations Board (“the Board”) found that the company, Mike Yuro-sek & Son, Inc. (“Yurosek”), violated 29 U.S.C. § 158 (a)(1) by discharging four employees after they refused to obey their supervisor’s directive to work an extra hour. The Board held that the employees’ refusal to work constituted a protected concerted activity, and the Board ordered Yurosek to offer the employees reinstatement and back-pay. The Board now seeks enforcement of its order. We affirm the Board’s findings and grant enforcement of its order.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Mike Yurosek & Son, Inc., is a vegetable packing company. Santos Diaz, Antonio Lopez, Rafael Naraes, and Jose Rivera worked on the dock crew, and each had been employed by Yurosek between nine and fifteen years.

In early September 1990, warehouse manager Juan Garza announced to the dock crew members that he was reducing their hours to approximately thirty-six hours a week. Some of the employees complained that the new schedule would not provide “enough time to finish the work.” Garza apparently responded: “That’s the way it’s going to be- You are going to punch [out] ... exactly at the time that I tell you.”

On September 24,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.