Carr
Carr v. Haruye Suzuki
45 F.2d 1013·1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3109
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 5, 1931No. 6119California50 words
Lead Opinion
The pertinent facts of this ease are staled in the opinion of Judge James, reported in 36 F. (2d) 424.
*1014 The law applicable to the' facts was correctly applied by the court below as construed by this court in Shizuko Kumanomido v. Nagle, 40 F.(2d) 42 .
Offer affirmed.