Barnhill

By the affidavits aforementioned, it was asserted on the part of the said two respondents that they had not threatened to commit, nor were they committing, acts complained of in complainants’ bill of complaint.

The motion to dismiss raised the question of law that complainants had not stated sufficient grounds to authorize the issuance of an injunction.

The court concludes that, the facts arid the law considered, complainants do not show that any right secured to them under the Federal Constitution has been infringed upon. It is held further that the alleged securities issued and proposed to be issued by the complainants come within the description contained in the Corporate Securities Act of the state of California (St. Cal. 1917, p. 673, as amended).

As a statement of the reasons upon which this decision is based, the court adopts and annexes hereto the opinion of the District Judge as rendered in this ease in denying the application of the complainants for a temporary restraining order. The application for injunction is denied, and the action is dismissed.

Hearing on application for a temporary restraining order. '

■ The bill of complaint in equity was filed against…