Ex parte Vilarino

Good Law
47 F.2d 912·1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1660
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 1930California1,462 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hazel, J.

These two eases were submitted together, and though the details are slightly different, *913 the charge against both relators, who coneed-edly are aliens, and the grounds of their deportation, are the same. In each proceeding the aliens, Vilarino and Rade, were separately charged in the immigration warrants with residing in tho United States in violation of the Immigration Act of October 16, 1918, as amended by Act June 5, 1920 (8 USCA § 137), in that both are members of the Communist Party — a society or group of persons who believe in, advise, and teach, the overthrow of the United States government by force, and with being members of an organization engaged in publishing and circulating printed documents or writings advising and teaching the overthrow of the government by violent means. Separate hearings were accorded the aliens by the immigration inspector with the result that deportation to the country from whence they came, on findings, was recommended to the Secretary of Labor, who ajiproved the findings of the inspector, and the warrants issued. Subsequently a writ of habeas corpus was granted on the asserted ground that a fair hearing was not had in that incompetent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.