Juan Centeno-Pravia Jorge Guillermo Centeno-Perez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

53 F.3d 337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Juan CENTENO-PRAVIA; Jorge Guillermo Centeno-Perez, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 93-70750. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 16, 1995. Decided April 26, 1995. Before: HUG, FARRIS, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Juan Centeno-Pravia ("Juan") and Jorge Centeno-Perez ("Jorge") petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, ("BIA") affirming the ruling of the immigration judge ("IJ") that denied their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. The BIA found that Juan's account of past persecution was incredible and that Jorge's account of actions against him did not amount to persecution. The BIA held that neither established a likelihood of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review. 3 The…