Carlos Castro v. Charles D. Marshall, Warden

53 F.3d 337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carlos CASTRO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-16340. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 19, 1995. * Decided April 26, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Castro appeals from the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We affirm. 3 Castro is serving a sentence of 15-years-to-life following a conviction in California Superior Court of second degree murder. While incarcerated at Folsom State Prison, Castro received a Serious Rule Violation Report for his alleged participation in the stabbing of a fellow inmate. A hearing was held on April 25, 1989. Castro was found guilty of the rules violation. His punishment was a forfeiture of 360 days of good-behavior credit. 4 After unsuccessful administrative appeals and…