Edward Bermingham James Bunting Philip H. Livingston v. Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Local 38 Ua Local 38

Good Law
53 F.3d 337·1995 WL 225642·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22795
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 199593-15937California977 words

Opinion

Opinion

53 F.3d 337 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8816 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward BERMINGHAM; James Bunting; Philip H. Livingston, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PLUMBING AND PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY LOCAL 38, et al.; UA Local 38, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15937. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1994. Decided April 14, 1995. Before: HUG, CANBY, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Appellants brought this action against their Union (Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry Local 38), its officers, and several employers associations. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees, dismissing several causes of action from appellants' amended complaint. This appeal is limited to review of the district court's order dismissing Appellant Livingston's civil RICO claim, which the district court directed be entered as a final judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). The district court held that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.