Wes Bevelhymer v. Clark County, William P. Henry

53 F.3d 337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Wes BEVELHYMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLARK COUNTY, William P. Henry, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15203. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 16, 1995. Decided April 26, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Wes Bevelhymer appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 claim against William Henry and his state law tort claim against Henry and Clark County. We affirm. FACTS 3 This appeal arises out of alleged conduct by defendant Henry after Henry discovered that Bevelhymer had begun a romantic relationship with Henry's former fiance, Ginger Gardner. During the relevant time period, Henry was a Chief Deputy District Attorney in the criminal division of the Clark County District Attorney's office. Bevelhymer alleges that Henry became jealous of Bevelhymer's relationship with Gardner and used his resources as a Chief…