Melvin Albiso Aurelio Jr. Casem v. Sherman Block County of Los Angeles Dwayne Benson Scott Johnson Ten Unknown Named L.A. County Deputy Sheriffs

53 F.3d 337 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Melvin ALBISO; Aurelio Jr. Casem, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Sherman BLOCK; County of Los Angeles; Dwayne Benson; Scott Johnson; Ten Unknown Named L.A. County Deputy Sheriffs, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55645. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 31, 1994. Decided May 1, 1995. Before: CANBY, LEAVY, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 I. Overview. 3 Melvin Albiso and Aurelio Casem, Jr., appeal the district court's directed verdict and summary judgments in favor of Los Angeles County deputy sheriffs ("the deputies") on their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 claims alleging unlawful seizure and use of excessive force. We reverse the directed verdict and remand for retrial on the issue of excessive force against Albiso. We affirm the summary judgment on excessive force with respect to the deputies who did not come into physical contact with Albiso during the handcuffing procedure.…