In re Kashani

53 F.3d 338 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Mir Kazem KASHANI; Habibeh S. Kashani, Debtors, Zarrin MOSHIRI; Mir Kazem Kashani; Habibeh S. Kashani, Appellants, v. IMPERIAL BANK; U.S. Trustee; Resolution Trust Corporation; Radmilla A. Fulton, Appellees. No. 93-56039. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 7, 1994. * Decided March 20, 1995. Before: FARRIS, POOLE and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Debtors Mir Kazem and Habibeh Kashani and unsecured creditor Zarrin Moshiri appeal pro se to challenge the bankruptcy court's approval of the settlement reached by the bankruptcy trustee and the Resolution Trust Corporation ("RTC") as receiver for County Bank. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 . We review the decision of the BAP de novo, In re Vasseli, 5 F.3d 351, 352 (9th Cir. 1993); In re Jensen, 995 F.2d 925, 927 (9th Cir. 1993); In re Dewalt, 961 F.2d 848, 850 (9th Cir. 1992), and we affirm on the basis…