Jagmohan Malik Veena Malik v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

53 F.3d 338 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jagmohan MALIK; Veena Malik, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70120. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 17, 1995. * Decided April 24, 1995. Before: NORRIS, WIGGINS and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 Jagmohan Malik and his wife, Veena, are Hindus from the state of Punjab, India. 1 They have five children who currently move around, living in both India and Berlin, Germany. On October 9, 1991, Malik entered the United States without inspection. At his deportation hearing, Malik admitted his deportability, but applied for asylum, withholding of deportation, and voluntary departure. He included his wife in his application; she has filed no separate application. 3 Malik testified that in June of 1990, three Sikh separatists visited him at his home in Punjab. He was a wealthy land broker, and they wanted a list of wealthy…