Kelly Cornejo v. James Gomez, Director Attorney General for the State of California

Good Law
53 F.3d 338·1995 WL 234898·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22758
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 20, 199594-55381California751 words

Opinion

Opinion

53 F.3d 338 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kelly CORNEJO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Director; Attorney General for the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-55381. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 5, 1995. Decided April 20, 1995. Before: NOONAN, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Kelly Cornejo ("Cornejo"), a state prisoner, appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief. Cornejo was convicted for second degree murder and assault with a deadly weapon under California state law. He was sentenced to prison for 16 years to life. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 . We affirm. 3 Cornejo contends that he was forced unconstitutionally to stand trial, alleging that: (1) he was incompetent at the time of trial and conviction, (2) he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.