Pankratz Lumber Co. v. United States

Good Law
50 F.2d 174·1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 4439
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 25, 1931No. 6363California419 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Neterer, J.

The appellant corporation was indicted in two counts, and George and John Pank-ratz, president and treasurer, respectively, of appellant, were indicted in two- counts of separate indictments charging falsification of income tax returns for the years 1927 and 1928 (26 USCA § 1266). The acts and transactions charged in each indictment are substantially the same, George and John Pank-ratz, as president and treasurer, made the returns for the appellant. The appellant was-eonvieted on count Z, charging falsification of the 1928 return, and -the Pankratzes were acquitted- ,on both counts. Appellant contends that the verdict of conviction is fatal because inconsistent and, from denial of motions in arrest of judgment and for a new-trial, appeals.

It was said at bar and in the briefs that the indictments were consolidated’ and tried together. 18 USCA § 557,. authorizes-consolidation of indictments when the parties are the same and the acts and transaction!are the same. When indictments are consolidated they become in legal effect separate-counts in one indictment. Kettenbach v. United States (C. C. A.) 202 F. 377 . In the--instant ease the parties are not the same. There is no order of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.