Ever Rudy Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

53 F.3d 338 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ever Rudy GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Nos. 94-70289, 94-70758. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 19, 1995. * Decided April 26, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ever Rudy Gonzalez, aka Ever Rudy Chicas, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") final order of deportation and subsequent order denying Gonzalez's motion to reopen. 1 3 Gonzalez contends that, with respect to the BIA's final order of deportation, the BIA erred by affirming the immigration judge's ("IJ") finding of deportability because: (1) the IJ denied him his right to counsel; and (2) his deportability could not be established on the basis of his February 5, 1982 entry without inspection. 4 With respect to the BIA's denial of his motion to reopen, Gonzalez…