Maria Concepcion Guerrero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
53 F.3d 338·1995 WL 251120·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22762
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 199594-70436California432 words

Opinion

Opinion

53 F.3d 338 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Maria Concepcion GUERRERO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70436. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 19, 1995. * Decided April 28, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Maria Concepcion Guerrero, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") summary dismissal of her appeal from the immigration judge's ("IJ") decision finding her deportable and denying her request for voluntary departure. Guerrero also appeals from the BIA's denial of her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a); see Chu v. INS, 875 F.2d 777, 770-80 (9th Cir.1989). We grant the petition for review. 3 The BIA summarily dismissed Guerrero's appeal because the notice of appeal (form EOIR-26) failed to list the issues she intended to present to the BIA with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.